🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate nuclear discussions with the United States provided that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had been made by mediators to resume discussions with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a challenging path since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the US president declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, EU nations employed their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be revived in some form if discussions resume.

The US president last week stated he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister said the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by military means. He stated the attacks began with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith hard to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Final Solution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to dictate their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and continues the final answer to settle disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this war. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to destroy, remains in place. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."