🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I know multiple businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.